|
Peter
Gills new play looks back in incredulous joy and looks forward
in bleak, sober disappointment. But it is not a bleak play. The
time is the early 1960s. John, a young, dissident middle-class Londoner
(Richard Coyle), comes to York as assistant director on an amateur
production of the Mystery Plays and falls in love with George (Lloyd
Owen), a farm labourer. George has a small part in the play, and
he lives with his mother (Anne Reid) in a tied cottage in a nearby
village. The opening scene, which is set some time after the central
events of the play, is masterly in its concision. You know nothing
about the two young men: the dialogue is spare, almost evasive,
but the sense of mutual need, the anxiety about how to handle it,
the fear of acknowledging it, the closeness between them and the
unbridgeable chasm are palpable: they ripple and tremble in the
air. Gill, who directs the play himself, attends to his characters
with the brooding care of a father and the precision of a surgeon.
You are in the other 1960s here: not the bustle of metropolitan
flamboyance, but the slow, cautious awakening of provincial England,
still wary, secretive, suspicious. People open up to the world with
watchful reluctance. Your identity is your home, your village, your
habits, and the way people accept them. A trip to London, staying
with John, Oxford Street, galleries, the ballet it is fun,
but it is elsewhere. George has a special, natural heartlessness
of somebody rooted: a healthy animal in its lair, proud, unselfconscious,
free in its native captivity. It is the self-consciousness he experiences
in another life, in London, and working in the theatre, that disconcerts
him. Ambition is dangerous because it destabilises your identity.
For George, acting is a discharge: he plays one of the torturers
and people notice how well he does it.
Sex with men is an intense and natural pleasure, but it is not binding:
other arrangements can be made. Self-sufficiency can be tyrannous.
George is the York realist of the title.
The play is about the price of change and the price of remaining
the same. Gills writing has a muscular delicacy: it reminds
you of As You Like It or The Tempest, some of David Storeys
plays and, indeed, the York Shepherds Plays. Half-finished
sentences hang in the air with a sense of finality, haunting and
bruising. The acting is spellbindingly simple: the characters seem
each to create a space around them that is both impenetrable and
longing to be filled. A hard, beautiful, heartbreaking and consoling
play.
|