|
"Back
to the Draining Board"
When does a play become a history play? By and large, being set
in 1960 wouldn't usually quite cut it. The date is in living memory
for too many people in the audience - the clothes still in too many
attics - for us to be able to cede it completely to the past. But
Peter Gill's play The York Realist is so knowing about the past
and its odd connections to the present that no other description
will do as well.
In 1964 Gill was an assistant director at the Royal Court, where
he made his mark with revelatory productions of DH Lawrence's dramas.
Now, nearly 40 years on, he returns to the Court with his own play,
a Lawrentian study of the love affair between George, a Yorkshire
farm labourer, and John, an assistant director up from London and
greatly excited by the new possibilities of Sixties theatre.
I'm sure that The York Realist was a pretty good evening at The
Lowry in Salford, where the English Touring Theatre gave it its
world première, but at the Court, in front of an audience
of actors and directors, many of whom made their reputations in
the Sixties, it was almost uncanny - an evening that suggested time
travel might actually be possible. There was even a kitchen-sink
on stage - a little nod to the theatrical revolution, which made
plays like this possible in the first place.
The striking thing about The York Realist, though, is that, for
all the knowing jokes about period pieces, it mostly behaves as
if the last forty years had never taken place. And while that would
usually be a damning phrase to attach to a work of art, in this
case it's what is best about it. The play serves as a reminder that
the theatrical upheavals of the Sixties weren't just a stepping
stone to contemporary theatre - a faintly embarrassing process to
be gone through, like some kind of artistic puberty - they were
an honourable end point in themselves.
By some lights Gill's play might look old-fashioned. While onstage
sex is now commonplace, for instance, the most explicit moment here
occurs when George pops out to the scullery for a tin of Vaseline.
The two men do not even exchange a kiss on stage. But the charge
of their mutual attraction is all the more powerful for that restraint.
There is, too, something stolidly unflashy in the dialogue - an
overlapping construction of hesitations and awkwardnesses, which,
line to line, gives little evidence of writerly bravura.
As the programme note puts it, it harks back to a time when regional
accents "were not simply accepted, they were celebrated"
- and what could be more quaint than that? Monty Python long ago
buried the Northern drama of class anxiety and social change, and
yet here it is, witty and moving and more alive than ever.
"That's years old. I'd like it all modern" George's mother
says, when John praises her battered old dresser. It can't help
but occur to you watching, that anyone who complained about The
York Realist's dramatic antiquity would be guilty of the same unthinking
indifference to the virtues of the past.
|