|
AFTER
MISS JULIE
Taken from The Financial Times
Written by Charles
Spencer
Performance at The Donmar Warehouse, London in November 2003
|
"Night
of guilty pleasures"
Love
and marriage, as Frank Sinatra once memorably informed us, go
together like a horse and carriage. And so, too, do August Strindberg
and Patrick Marber, though there is precious little romance in
the air in After Miss Julie, just lashings of sex, violence and
class hatred. I need hardly add that I loved this show.
Marber
first adapted Strindberg's thrillingly intemperate account of sex
across the class divide for television in 1995, just before he wrote
his big hit Closer, an account of the tortuous love affairs and
infidelities of four present-day Londoners. Closer has been described
as an updated version of Coward's Private Lives given a bitter late-20th-century
twist. But, in its bruising sexual confrontations and keen awareness
of the way love and desire can so easily corrode into jealousy and
hatred, it was clear that Marber also had a great deal in common
with Strindberg.
In a note to his version of Miss Julie, Marber writes: "At
times I have been unfaithful to the original, but always conscious
that infidelity might be an act of love."
That love shines through in this electrifying stage version, blazingly
directed by Michael Grandage, and so too does a keen dramatic intelligence.
Miss Julie has never seemed more relevant, or more resonant.
The action of Strindberg's "naturalistic tragedy" is set
on a Swedish estate during a heady midsummer night. In Marber's
version, the action has been shifted to the estate of an English
socialist peer on the night of Labour's landslide election victory
in 1945.
While Miss Julie's father celebrates Labour's success in London
and his servants enjoy a boozy dance in the barn, Miss Julie seeks
out her father's chauffeur, John, in the kitchen, beautifully realised
in Bunny Christie's meticulously detailed design.
The Labour landslide gives an added piquancy to this account of
a transgressive one-night stand. For here we are in an upstairs-downstairs
world in which nothing seems to have changed since the previous
century, despite his Lordship's socialism. John and his fiancee
Christine, the cook (excellent Helen Baxendale), stand to attention
when Miss Julie enters, light her cigarettes for her, and speak
to her with studied deference.
Miss Julie, with her cut-glass accent and air of long-bred superiority,
seems like a creature from a more exotic planet in the drab kitchen,
but the sexual tension that crackles between her and John when Christine
falls asleep is manifest and leads inevitably to the bedroom.
Marber is far more frank than Strindberg could ever be about their
night of passion. When Miss Julie starts putting on airs the following
morning and screams, "Stand up when you speak to me. Remember
your position!", John replies with unforgettable insolence:
"Which one, Madame? There were so many."
Kelly Reilly brilliantly captures the spoilt hauteur and louche
sensuality of Miss Julie, but, as she faces the prospect of public
shame, she also makes you feel genuine concern for this sexually
voracious yet emotionally frigid woman, driven to the point of no
return by her passion and her class. There is a trembling, barely
contained hysteria in Reilly's performance as she fluctuates between
desperate panic, impossible dreams and ludicrously inappropriate
hauteur that keeps you on the edge of your seat.
Richard Coyle's John matches her every step of the way in this
fatal dance of desire, moving from deference to stinging insults
and an eye to the main chance before the summons of his master's
bell reduces him once again to cringing subservience.
Together the pair create an atmosphere of violent and depraved sexuality
that is deeply and disturbingly erotic. An unforgettable night of
white-hot theatrical intensity.
|
|
|
Copyright
© 2001-2004 RICHARDCOYLE.COM
All Rights Reserved
|