|
"Julie,
do you want me? A brilliant reworking of Miss Julie revives the
play."
Part voyeuristic body-ripper, part angry class-warfare. At one instant
slow and domestic; at the next, full of hysterical flights. It's
not easy to make Miss Julie work on the stage. But the Donmar has
found a way. Patrick Marber has done Strindberg and the stage a
big favour by supplying a fundamental reimagining of Strindberg's
play. And Michael Grandage has given it a fiercely attentive, magnetic
production.
The basic plot remains. One heady night, an upper-class young woman
has a fling with a manservant that destroys her. But Marber has
moved the play from nineteenth-century Sweden to England in 1945,
and the night of the Labour Party's election victory. In doing so,
he has clarified the action (things go a bit foggy, especially in
the sex area, in the original), and tightly focused the social relations.
The man's fiancée who circles the action, watching on with
sour pragmatism, looks here like a new kind of female and a new
kind of working class - well capable of running things if she's
really going to get power. Even in a pinny, Helen Baxendale looks
more like a Vogue cover than a drudge, but she powerfully projects
the shrewdness, the composure and realism that will cause her pain
but give her strength.
Marber has cut some dull bits of back-plot, and added some wit of
his own: the play loses none of its darkness for being made more
springy and astringent.
There will always be some things that don't exactly add up: why
exactly do the one-night-standers feel so shamed? Is a bloody end
really inevitable? But new kinds of sense emerge in this version,
where all three characters are caught in an old system with the
possibility of change dangled elusively before them. And it's the
brilliance of Grandage's production to transmit emotions so hugely
in excess of the facts and of reason that the action of the play
seems to have a lunar logic of its own, and the changes of temperature
to follow a hidden pulse: moving in a second from the deliberate
to the wild and hectic.
Bunny Christie's meticulous period kitchen - with its painted brick
walls, its small jug of flowers, its table with brass-handled drawers
- is solid, well-ordered. It's the fitting arena for those long
passages where Baxendale is peacefully alone on stage, smoking,
boiling up potions (to make a dog miscarry), arranging her master's
boots. And the perfect, unexpected setting for a brutal sexual encounter.
Richard Coyle's manservant is terrific: stealthy and fervent
- both attractive and dislikeable. Kelly Reilly gives an amazing
portrait of a wounded creature bent on hurting herself still more.
Her voice is as clipped as the Queen's was at the same period; she
moves as if her limbs were unwelcome, fragile attachments. She suggests
someone allergic to herself; someone with neurasthenia wired into
her. It suddenly seems pertinent that this landed lady's father
committed suicide.
|