DON CARLOS
Taken from The Times
Written by
Benedict Nightingale
Performance at
Crucible, Sheffield in October 2004
*****

After five years of consistent excellence, this is Michael Grandage’s farewell production as the Crucible’s artistic supremo. Sheffield’s loss is London’s gain. If Grandage brings half as much distinction to the same job at the Donmar, we’ll be doing well.

Anyone who can leave you wishing that three hours of Schiller was actually four or five, as he is doing now, could successfully stage the Henry VI cycle backwards or even Timon of Athens forwards.

Not that Don Carlos need be a slog. With the right cast, atmosphere, energy and tension, you can see why the play is still loved by Schiller’s compatriots. Grandage has brought us all that, starting with Derek Jacobi as the play’s most fascinating character: not Carlos, Hamlet-like son of Philip II of Spain and (one suspects) the youthful author’s self-portrait, but the king himself. When he took the role in the RSC’s revival of the play in 2000, John Woodvine managed to resemble the hard, paranoid Stalin yet suggest the haunted, mangled man beneath. I had expected Jacobi to give us the inner Philip, too, but wondered if he had the hardness for the outer one. Well, no problem. When this thin, grim figure promises to bring “terror” to his and the Church’s enemies, his voicebox sounding as if he gargles with iron filings, you believe him almost more than when, sickened by the court’s intrigues and his own loneliness, he betrays a hint of human yearning, a flicker of vulnerability.

He is the mesmerising centre of a production that brings clarity to a plot which Schiller himself accused of over-complexity. You always know that what is at stake is the soul of Spain. Who will triumph? The courtiers who slither like black shades through the vast doors and into the twilight of Christopher Oram’s vast, bleak set, prime among them Ian Hogg’s Alba, scourge of heresy in colonial Flanders, and a clerical sidekick equally hostile to that “terrible disease, humanity”? Or could the future belong to Richard Coyle’s warm, sensitive Carlos and his inspirational friend, Elliot Cowan’s Posa?

Schiller may identify with Carlos, but it is Posa who expresses his views. Though the play is set in the 16th century, he is the voice of Romantic idealism, so passionate in his faith in political and intellectual freedom that he very nearly converts an impressed Philip to republicanism. That is not only absurdly anachronistic but troubling, since our generation has good reason to mistrust men who ask us to sacrifice ourselves for the sake of an egalitarian future. But at the time you are arrested, gripped, bounced into belief.

And so you are with encounter after encounter: from those involving Claire Price as the young queen whom Carlos adores, to the encounter between Jacobi’s Philip and Peter Eyre as the Grand Inquisitor, a looming, red-clad figure who would be terrifying even without his splindly walking sticks, blindfold and overarching contempt. The only worry is this: how will Sheffield fare after Grandage?


Copyright © 2001-2004 RICHARDCOYLE.COM
All Rights Reserved